Drawing for GRAYS BY GARY WASSERMAN

USPTO serial 74002334

GRAYS BY GARY WASSERMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAYS BY GARY WASSERMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CASEY F. WILSON

CASEY F WILSON BOULT, CUMMINGS, CONNERS & BERRY222 THIRD AVE N P O BOX 198062NASHVILLE, TN 37219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025MEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY SUITS, SPORT COATS, SLACKS, RAINCOATS, TOPCOATS AND OVERCOATSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 10, 1991EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 21, 1991CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 27, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 15, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance