USPTO serial 74002367
JURISAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1833504Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 1994
- Examiner
- HICKS, MICHAEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JURISAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE P. KRAMER
Thomas S. Birney DORR, CARSON & BIRNEY, PC5299 DTC Blvd., Suite 340Greenwood Village, CO 80111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | LEASING ACCESS TIME TO A DATABASE OF LEGAL INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES, WHICH IS PROVIDED VIA SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 23, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 18, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 15, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |