Drawing for HEALTHY EATING

USPTO serial 74002372

HEALTHY EATING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY EATING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL C. VAN SLYKE

PAUL C VAN SLYKE PRAVEL, GAMBRELL, HEWITT, ET AL1177 W LOOP S STE 1010HOUSTON, TX 77027UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030BISCUIT MIX AND PANCAKE-WAFFLE MIXABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 8, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 9, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 1991ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 6, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 29, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 12, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance