USPTO serial 74002374
ARVIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1692475Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 9, 1992
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARVIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE E. O'CONNOR
BRUCE E O'CONNOR CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, ET AL2800 PACIFIC FIRST CTR1420 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | STEREOSCOPIC IMAGE GENERATING SYSTEMS, COMPRISING CAMERAS, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR GENERATION AND DISPLAY OF IMAGES; AND STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY APPARATUS, NAMELY DUAL CURVED DISPLAY SCREENS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 22, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT VISION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT VISION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CONCEPT VISION SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ARVIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 1992 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |