Drawing for THE GREAT ONE

USPTO serial 74002636

THE GREAT ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE GREAT ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LORI N. BOATRIGHT

LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001ANTI-FREEZE, SUMMER COOLANT, FRAGRANCES FOR USE IN MANUFACTURE OF TOILETRIES AND COSMETICSACTIVE—
003COLOGNE AND FRAGRANCESACTIVE—
007SNOW REMOVAL MACHINES, NAMELY, SNOW BLOWERS AND SNOW PLOWSACTIVE—
009COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS, COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES AND COMPUTER GAME CASSETTESACTIVE—
014JEWELRYACTIVE—
020NOVELTY ITEMS NAMELY, KEY CHAIN TAGS MADE PRIMARILY OF ACRYLIC AND PLASTICACTIVE—
021BEVERAGE COOLERSACTIVE—
025FOOTWEAR, HATS AND PAJAMASACTIVE—
028TOYS NAMELY, HAND-HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, STAND ALONE VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES, BOARD GAMES, ACTION FIGURES, PLUSH TOYS, TABLE TOP HOCKEY GAMES, AND TOY HOCKEY EQUIPMENT NAMELY, PUCKS, STICKS, BALLS, GOALS, PADS AND NETSACTIVE—
029PEANUT BUTTERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 9, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 1998CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 30, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 23, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 1997ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 23, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 22, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 15, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 1994CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 4, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 27, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 19, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 29, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance