Drawing for FRED HAYMAN BEVERLY HILLS FREQUENT BUYER

USPTO serial 74002769

FRED HAYMAN BEVERLY HILLS FREQUENT BUYER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRED HAYMAN BEVERLY HILLS FREQUENT BUYER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NORMAN ZAFMAN

NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RETAIL STORE AND MAIL ORDER CATALOG SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FRAGRANCE PRODUCTS, CLOTHING, ACCESSORIES AND LEATHER GOODSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 1994ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 6, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 1992OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 27, 1992OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 8, 1991OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 9, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 5, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance