USPTO serial 74002825
ORACLE ALLIANCE PROGRAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORACLE ALLIANCE PROGRAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NEIL D. GREENSTEIN
NEIL D GREENSTEIN BAKER & MCKENZIE37TH FL777 S FIGUEROA STLOS ANGELES, CA 90017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | Sep 26, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1994 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 1994 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 1, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1992 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1991 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |