USPTO serial 74002849
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD D. SEIBEL
RICHARD D SEIBEL CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALEPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | RUBBER STAMPS; STAMPS, STICKERS AND DECALS; STAMP ALBUMS AND LOOSE LEAF BINDERS; BOOKS; NAMELY, COMPOSITION BOOKS, FICTION AND NON-FICTION POP-UP BOOKS OF INTEREST TO CHILDREN, TRADE BOOKS, EDUCATIONAL BOOKS INCLUDING TEXT BOOKS FOR ALL GRADE LEVELS, MASS MARKET PAPERBACK BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, COFFEE TABLE BOOKS, CHILDREN'S BOOKS, COLORING BOOKS, COOK BOOKS, DATA BOOKS, LOG BOOKS, PICTURE BOOKS, RECIPE BOOKS, GUEST BOOKS, TRAVEL BOOKS, NOTEBOOKS, DIARIES, SCIENTIFIC BOOKS, SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS, COMIC BOOKS, CATALOGS, BROCHURES, AND OPERATING MANUALS IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 1993 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Apr 22, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 22, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |