USPTO serial 74002940
99
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 99?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORI N. BOATRIGHT
LORI N BOATRIGHT BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |