USPTO serial 74003098
POWDER GRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 5, 1991
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POWDER GRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
WILMINGTON, DE
AGRIUM ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES (U.S.) INC.
SYLACAUGA, AL
Other trademarks owned by AGRIUM ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES (U.S.) INC.
BRANTFORD, ONTARIO, CA
WILMINGTON, DE
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CANDICE LYNN BELL
CANDACE LYNN BELL ESQ KAVINOKY COOK LLP726 EXCHANGE ST STE 800BUFFALO, NY 14210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | FERTILIZER FOR LAWN, GARDEN, AGRICULTURAL AND COMMERCIAL USES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NOR-AM CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by NOR-AM CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by AGRIUM ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES (U.S.) INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NU-GRO AMERICA CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AGREVO USA COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by NOR-AM CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named POWDER GRAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 5, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 11, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |