USPTO serial 74003160
JEWISHMEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACK, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JEWISHMEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ FLEIT, JACOBSON, COHN, PRICE, ET ALTHE JENIFER BLDG 400 7TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1992 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 5, 1992 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |