Drawing for FUZZIMALS

USPTO serial 74003320

FUZZIMALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUZZIMALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT L. BELLO

HERBERT L BELLO40 GROVE STWELLESLEY, MA 02181UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PAPER PARTY HATS, MODELING COMPOUND, PAINT-BY-THE NUMBER SETS, STICKERS, STENCIL SETS, CHILDREN'S BOOKS, PHOTO OR STAMP ALBUMS, ENVELOPES AND PRINTED STATIONERY, GREETING CARDS, PAPER NAPKINS, PENCIL BOXES, GIFT TAGS, PAPER PARTY DECORATIONS, PAPER STREAMERS, PAPER PARTY LOOT BAGS, AND PAPER PARTY BLOWOUTS, PAPER CAKE DECORATIONS, CARTOONS AND WRAPPING PAPERABANDONED—
025LADIES, MEN, GIRLS, BOYS AND INFANTS CLOTHING; NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS, TOPS, BLOUSES, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, PANTS, JACKETS, COATS, CAMISOLES, UNDERGARMENTS, UNDERSHIRTS, RAINCOATS, SOCKS, TOQUES, SCARVES, GLOVES, JUMPSUITS, DRESSES, HATS, SLEEPSHIRTS, ONE PIECE SLEEPERS, ALL SLEEPWEAR ARTICLESABANDONED—
028DOLL CLOTHING, CRIB TOYS, CRIB MOBILES, CRIB ORNAMENTS, PLUSH TOYS, DOLL CARRIERS, MINIATURE DOLLS, POSEABLE FIGURES, TOY VEHICLES, CARRYING CASES FOR DOLLS, BOARD GAMES, JIGSAW PUZZLES, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS, AND CHRISTMAS TREE DECORATIONSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 1994EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 17, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 22, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 1993REINREINSTATED—
Jan 5, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 31, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 1992UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 13, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 18, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance