USPTO serial 74003476
ANDERMAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1638260Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 19, 1991
- Examiner
- BLUE, RACHEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ANDERMAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. LYNN PERRY
E LYNN PERRY TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR - 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | PERSONAL IRRIGATION DEVICES FOR PERSONAL HYGIENE, NAMELY, DOUCHES FOR PERIANAL CLEANSING, WATER SPRAYERS FOR ORAL CLEANSING, AND PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, HOSES, FAUCET ADAPTORS, VALVES, HANDLES, SPRAY WANDS, AND SOAP CARTRIDGES, PERSONAL IRRIGATION DEVICES FOR PERSONAL HYGIENE, NAMELY, WATER AND SOAP DISPENSING MACHINES SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED FOR MEDICAL USE AND PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, HOSES, VALVES, HANDLES, SPRAY WANDS, AND SOAP CARTRIDGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 9, 1963 |
| 011 | PERSONAL IRRIGATION DEVICES FOR PERSONAL HYGIENE, NAMELY, SITZ BATHS, BIDETS, AND PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, HOSES, FAUCET ADAPTORS, VALVES, HANDLES, SPRAY WANDS, AND SOAP CARTRIDGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 9, 1963 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 6, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 25, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |