USPTO serial 74003709
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL
LYNNE E GRAYBEAL MONROE, STOKES, EITELBACH & LAWRENCE800 FIFTH AVE STE 4000SEATTLE, WA 98104-3199UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF AUDIO AND VIDEO PROGRAMMING, SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, AND CABLE TELEVISION SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |