Drawing for FRESH N UPS

USPTO serial 74003784

FRESH N UPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COHEN, JEFFREY R.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH N UPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL EBERT

MICHAEL EBERT HOPGOOD, CALIMAFDE, KALIL, ET AL60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PRE-MOISTENED TISSUES FOR USE ON INFANTSABANDONEDSep 19, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 17, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 8, 1991EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 22, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 11, 1991CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 14, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 12, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 7, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance