Drawing for HAKUSAN

USPTO serial 74004343

HAKUSAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAKUSAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LEE BENDEKGEY

LEE BENDEKGEY GRAHAM & JAMESONE MARITIME PLZ STE 300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033SAKEABANDONEDMay 9, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 1992ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 1991IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 17, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 1991AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 13, 1990IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 9, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 7, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance