USPTO serial 74004834
LIFESAVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIFESAVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M4T 2HP,, CA
ST. CATHARINES, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY J. ROGERS
STANLEY J ROGERS ROGERS & SCOTTSTE 201 277 LAKESHORE RD EOAKVILLE, ON L6J 6J3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | DOMESTIC WATER DISTILLING UNITS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1993 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |