USPTO serial 74004849
FAIL-SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAIL-SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN BURTON
JOHN BURTON THE GREYHOUND CORPORATIONPHOENIX, AZ 85077UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING BACK-UP SHARE DRAFT PROCESSING SERVICES FOR CREDIT UNIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 19, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 19, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 21, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |