USPTO serial 74004920
PONY EXPRESS LEATHER SAN FRANCISCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PONY EXPRESS LEATHER SAN FRANCISCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELVILLE OWEN
MELVILLE OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S AND WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, TROUSERS, PANTS, SHORTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SWEATERS, JACKETS, COATS, RAIN COATS, PONCHOS, SLICKERS, TEE SHIRTS, VESTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, ROMPERS, ONE-PIECE JUMPSUITS, SWIM WEAR, JOGGING WEAR, LEOTARDS, HATS, GLOVES, TIES AND MUFFLERS, SCARVES, HOSIERY, SOCKS; AND ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PONY EXPRESS LEATHER, SAN FRANCISCO
- Other trademarks owned by PONY EXPRESS LEATHER, SAN FRANCISCO
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named PONY EXPRESS LEATHER SAN FRANCISCO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1992 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |