USPTO serial 74005051
SAMSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAMSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY PANITCH SCHWARZE JACOBS & NADELFIVE PENN CTR PLZ 36TH FL1601 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CANNED FISH, NAMELY, SARDINES, MACKEREL, ANCHOVIES, TUNA AND SALMON | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 26, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 8, 1992 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 21, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |