Drawing for MARCO POLO

USPTO serial 74005386

MARCO POLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARCO POLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

URSULA B. DAY

URSULA B DAY Law form of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ADVERTISING AND EMPLOYMENT AGENCY SERVICES; AND BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICESABANDONED—
042HOTEL SERVICES AND NEWS AGENCY SERVICES - NAMELY, GATHERING AND DISSEMINATING OF NEWSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 12, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 6, 1990REINREINSTATED—
Oct 30, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance