Drawing for AO SAFETY

USPTO serial 74005456

AO SAFETY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AO SAFETY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID S. FISHMAN

DAVID S FISHMAN FISHMAN, DIONNE & CANTOR88 DAY HILL RDWINDSOR, CT 06095UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PROTECTIVE AND SAFETY APPARATUS, NAMELY SAFETY PRESCRIPTION AND NON-PRESCRIPTION EYEWEAR, NAMELY SAFETY EYEGLASSES, SUNGLASSES AND GOGGLES; FACESHIELDS; HEAD PROTECTORS, NAMELY SAFETY HELMETS AND CONSTRUCTION HARDHATS; HEARING PROTECTORS, NAMELY, INDUSTRIAL EAR MUFFS AND EAR PLUGS; AND INDUSTRIAL RESPIRATORSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 1992ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 1992EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 1991EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 1991NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 24, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance