USPTO serial 74005600
ELIJAH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELIJAH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH M. GARRETT
KENNETH M GARRETT1033 BAY STSTE 308TORONTO, ON M5S 3A5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE RECORDED COMPUTER PROGRAMS RELAING TO RELIGIOUS STUDIES AND MANUALS SOLD IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |