USPTO serial 74006492
VASOCOMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VASOCOMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILLIP H. SMITH
PHILLIP H SMITH MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL APPARATUS FOR MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF BLOOD PRESSURE WAVE FORMS; NAMELY, AN INVASIVE INSTRUMENT AND UNIT COMPRISED OF A COMPUTER MONITOR USED TO OBTAIN BLOOD PRESSURE WAVE DATA BY MEANS OF AN INDWELLING CATHETER, A TRANSDUCER-AMPLIFIER AND ANALOG-DIGITAL CONVERTER BOARD PRODUCING READABLE MEDIA DATA FOR ANALYSIS OF BLOOD PRESSURE IN CLINICAL RESEARCH; ALSO AN INSTRUMENT AND UNIT COMPRISED OF A COMPUTER, ELECTRONIC DISPLAY AND CONNECTION TO DIAGNOSTIC PATIENT MONITORS IN HOSPITAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS AND INTENSIVE CORONARY CARE UNITS FOR ANALYSIS OF ARTERIAL VASCULAR COMPLIANCE AND/OR CARDIAC OUTPUT VALVES; AND A NON-INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE ANALYSIS INSTRUMENT AND UNIT COMPRISED OF A STANDARD OR PRIMARY BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF, A SECONDARY BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF USED IN ANOTHER LOCATION ON THE PATIENT, A COMPUTER AND ELECTRONIC DISPLAY FOR ANALYSIS OF ARTERIAL VASCULAR COMPLIANCE AND/OR CARDIAC OUTPUT VALVES FOR USE BY PHYSICIANS IN OFFICES, HOSPITALS AND CLINICS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 1992 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1991 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |