USPTO serial 74006810
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE J. LONG
THEODORE J LONG LATHROP & CLARK122 W WASHINGTON AVEP O BOX 1507MADISON, WI 53701-1507| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MAGNETIC CLIPS AND MAGNETIC CONTAINERS FOR DESK ACCESSORIES | ABANDONED | Mar 9, 1990 |
| 016 | PAPER CORRUGATED SHELF AND STORAGE UNITS FOR LOCKERS AND MESSAGE BOARDS FOR LOCKERS | ABANDONED | Mar 7, 1990 |
| 020 | PHOTOGRAPH FRAMES, MIRRORS AND PLASTIC SUCTION CUPS WITH HOOKS USED ON VARIOUS NONPOROUS SURFACES | ABANDONED | Apr 2, 1990 |
| 022 | NYLON HANGING BAGS WITH STORAGE COMPARTMENTS FOR LOCKERS | ABANDONED | Apr 3, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 1992 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1990 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |