USPTO serial 74006902
TUMBLE DRY WOOL BRANDELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, SUSAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUMBLE DRY WOOL BRANDELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY KLEIN
HENRY KLEIN LADAS & PARRY3600 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1520LOS ANGELES, CA 90010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | METERIAL TREATMENT SERVICES NAMELY CUSTOM TREATING CLOTHING AND FABRIC FOR OTHERS TO ENSURE A WASHFAST ANTISTATIC FINISH, ENHANCE SOFTNESS, MINIMIZE SHRINKAGE AND SHAPE LOSS, AND REDUCE FELTING, PILING, AND FADING | ABANDONED | Nov 6, 1986 |
| 042 | PROVIDING THE CUSTOM DESIGN OF CLOTHING AND FABRIC AND DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CLOTHING AND FABRIC | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |