USPTO serial 74007072
BIOSOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SZOKE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOSOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert P. Halluin
ALBERT P HALLUIN PENNIE & EDMONDS1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BIOCHEMICALS; NAMELY, HEMOGLOBIN, NEUROLOGICAL SUBSTANCES, WOUND HEALING SUBSTANCES, AND BIOREMEDIATION SUBSTANCES FOR USE IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FOR SCIENTIFIC DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSES, AND FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND PHARMACEUTICALS; MODIFIED VIRUSES FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | BIOCHEMICALS; NAMELY, HEMOGLOBIN, NEUROLOGICAL SUBSTANCES, WOUND HEALING SUBSTANCES, AND BIOREMEDIATION SUBSTANCES FOR MEDICAL AND MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC USES, AND FOR USE AS PHARMACEUTICALS; MODIFIED VIRUSES FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIOSOURCE GENETICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BISOURCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BIOSOURCE GENETICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named BIOSOURCE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 1996 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1990 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |