USPTO serial 74007796
AUTOTRUST AS GOOD AS NEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTOTRUST AS GOOD AS NEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EAST MALVERN, VICTORIA, AU
EAST MALVERN, VICTORIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLEY S. WITT
LESLEY S WITTONE UNITED BANK CTR1700 LINCOLN ST 13TH FLDENVER, CO 80203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | AUTOMOBILES, BUSES, TRUCKS, MOTORCYCLES, MOTOR HOMES, VANS AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 17, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |