USPTO serial 74008262
STONGLAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 1992
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STONGLAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MAPLE SHADE, NJ
MAPLE SHADE, NJ
MAPLE SHADE, NJ
MAPLE SHADE, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N. QUINN
CHARLES N QUINN DANN DORFMAN HERRELL SKILLMAN1601 MARKET ST STE 720PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | EPOXY HARDENERS, CHEMICAL EPOXY ADDITIVES, EPOXY CURING AGENTS, EPOXIES FOR USE AS COMPONENTS IN MIXTURES, CHEMICAL SOLVENTS ALL SOLELY FOR USE IN INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL APPLICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1986 |
| 002 | PROTECTIVE EPOXY COATINGS INCLUDING TWO-COMPONENT EPOXY-BASED COATINGS FOR USE IN INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL APPLICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STONHARD, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STONHARD, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STONCOR GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by STONHARD, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named STONGLAZE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | PRA9 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 9 | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | PRA9 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 9 | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 21, 1998 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 19, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 25, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |