CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THATCHER TUBES

USPTO serial 74008278

THATCHER TUBES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1679067Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 1992
Examiner
POMPEY, TINA
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THATCHER TUBES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM G KRATZ JR

WILLIAM G KRATZ JR ARMSTRONG WESTERMAN HATTORI ET AL429 4TH AVE STE 707PITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037MANUFACTURE OF PLASTIC SQUEEZE TUBES AND CLOSURES FOR PLASTIC TUBES TO THE ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
042CUSTOM DESIGN OF PLASTIC SQUEEZE TUBES AND CLOSURES FOR PLASTIC TUBESSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 28, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 13, 2002RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 13, 200289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 14, 2002PRA9RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 9—
May 14, 200289AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
May 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2002PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Mar 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 200289AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Sep 14, 19978.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 2, 19978.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Mar 10, 1992R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 9, 1991CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 1991IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 28, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 18, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 20, 1991AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 17, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 1990IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 18, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance