USPTO serial 74008778
PATHFINDER LEARNING SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PATHFINDER LEARNING SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN T. BROWN
SUSAN T BROWN CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMAN1615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER-MANAGED EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM COMPRISING COMPUTER HAREWARE, MODEMS, DISPLAY MONITORS, COMPUTER OPERATING SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SOFWARE FOR EDUCATIONAL APPLICATIONS, PRE-RECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTE TAPES RELATING TO READING AND WRITING SKILLS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, SOCIAL STUDIES, AND EMPLOYMENT/LIFE SKILLS, AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTE TAPE RECORDERS AND BOOKS AND MANUALS SOLD | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |