USPTO serial 74008779
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD LINN, ESQ.
RICHARD LINN ESQ MARKS MURASE & WHITESTE 750 2001 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for generating reports for database management, image storage, networking, image digitizing and enhancement, measuring and displaying images, and annotating and quantitying video images; computers, computer peripherals, endoscopes and computer interfaces therefor, all for use in endoscopic diagnosis and patient information management | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | operation manuals for computerized endoscopy system; technical newsletters dealing with endoscopy | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | database services for differential diagnosis and disease management | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 14, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |