Drawing for EVE T.E.A.M. SYSTEM

USPTO serial 74008779

EVE T.E.A.M. SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVE T.E.A.M. SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD LINN, ESQ.

RICHARD LINN ESQ MARKS MURASE & WHITESTE 750 2001 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for generating reports for database management, image storage, networking, image digitizing and enhancement, measuring and displaying images, and annotating and quantitying video images; computers, computer peripherals, endoscopes and computer interfaces therefor, all for use in endoscopic diagnosis and patient information managementABANDONED—
016operation manuals for computerized endoscopy system; technical newsletters dealing with endoscopyABANDONED—
042database services for differential diagnosis and disease managementABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 22, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 16, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 7, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 1, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 10, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 1990REINREINSTATED—
Nov 14, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance