Drawing for BBA FRICTION

USPTO serial 74008961

BBA FRICTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOSKOWITZ SIDNEY I
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BBA FRICTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DONALD K. HUBER

DONALD K HUBER MCCORMICK, PAULDING & HUBER266 PEARL STHARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINE COUPLINGS AND BELTING; PARTS OF MACHINES, NAMELY, CLUTCHES, BRAKES, CLUTCH PLATES, CLUTCH FACINGS AND LINERS, PISTON AND CYLINDER UNITS FOR BRAKES AND CLUTCHES, DRUM BRAKE LININGS, DISC BRAKE PADS, BRAKE DRUMS AND DISCS, BRAKE SHOES, BRAKE CALIPERS AND BEARINGS; AND ELECTRIC MOTOR, GENERATORS, DYNAMOS AND ALTERNATORSABANDONED—
012BRAKES, CLUTCHES AND ELECTRIC MOTORS FOR LAND VEHICLES, AND PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY, CLUTCH PLATES, CLUTCH FACINGS AND LINERS, PISTON AND CYLINDER UNITS FOR BRAKES AND CLUTCHES, DRUM BRAKE LININGS, DISC BRAKE PADS, BRAKE DRUMS AND DISCS, BRAKE SHOES AND BRAKE CALIPERSABANDONED—
017BRAKING AND CLUTCHING MATERIAL; BRAKE LINING MATERIALS; CLUTCH LININGS AND MATERIALS THEREFOR; PADS, MOULDINGS AND SHAPED SECTIONS OF FRICTIONAL MATERIALABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 1992ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 1992EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 15, 1992EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 1991NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance