Drawing for D.&P.L.CO. ORIGINATORS OF DELTAPINE PLANTING SEED

USPTO serial 74009281

D.&P.L.CO. ORIGINATORS OF DELTAPINE PLANTING SEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with D.&P.L.CO. ORIGINATORS OF DELTAPINE PLANTING SEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H. ELLIOTT, JR.

WILLIAM H ELLIOTT JR SYNNESTVEDT & LECHNER2600 ONE READING CTR1101 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031AGRICULTURAL PLANTING SEEDABANDONEDMar 1, 1938

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 17, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 31, 1991EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 24, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 28, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance