Drawing for EURO-CUISINE

USPTO serial 74009382

EURO-CUISINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1724517Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 13, 1992
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EURO-CUISINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI

LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008[ FLATWARE AND SERVING UTENSILS; NAMELY, KNIVES, FORKS, SPOONS ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
021COOKWARE; NAMELY, SKILLETS, DUTCH OVENS, STOCKPOTS, BOILERS, SAUCEPANS, TEA KETTLES, FONDUES, BURNER COVERS, BOWLS, FRY PANS, OVAL DISHES, DEEP FRYERS AND COLANDERS; DINNERWARE; NAMELY, DISHES, CUPS, MUGS, SERVING BOWLS; DRINKING GLASSES, AND LADLESEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2003CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Feb 12, 1999C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 11, 1999XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION—
Oct 6, 1998815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 13, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 17, 1992CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 3, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 13, 1992CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 27, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 1992SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 12, 1992IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 13, 1991NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 24, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 26, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 16, 1990CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 27, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance