Drawing for DINO VALENTINO

USPTO serial 74009419

DINO VALENTINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINO VALENTINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE E. LILLING

BRUCE E LILLING LILLING & GREENSPAN123 MAIN STWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025sneakersABANDONEDFeb 22, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 5, 1992EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 2, 1991CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 12, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 12, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 1990AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 4, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 1990IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 6, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance