USPTO serial 74009654
GOURMET DIET CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOEGELI, JAMES F.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOURMET DIET CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WARREN D. FLACKBERT
WARREN D FLACKBERTSTE D 401 N WEINBACH AVEEVANSVILLE, IN 47711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DIETARY CLUB SERVICES, NAMELY, PREPARING AND SERVING MEDICALLY PRESCRIBED DIETARY FOOD IN AN ESTABLISHMENT | ABANDONED | Nov 6, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 8, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |