Drawing for INFOTALK

USPTO serial 74009853

INFOTALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFOTALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN D. WITTSTEIN

MARTIN D WITTSTEIN PITNEY BOWES INCONE ELMCROFT RDSTAMFORD, CT 06926-0700UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009DIGITAL VOICE EXCHANGE IN THE NATURE OF INTERACTIVE DIGITAL VOICE RESPONSE UNITS FOR PROVIDING PRE-RECORDED INFORMATION AND PROMPTS FOR CALLER RESPONSESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 1992ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 1991IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 4, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 1990CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
May 10, 1990AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 12, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 1990IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 19, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance