USPTO serial 74010008
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
FORT WORTH, TX
Other trademarks owned by TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
FORT WORTH, TX
Other trademarks owned by TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
FORT WORTH, TX
Other trademarks owned by TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S. ABRAMS
DAVID S ABRAMS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CHILDREN'S COMBINATION MEAL CONSISTING OF EITHER HAMBURGER SANDWICH, CHICKEN SANDWICH, FISH SANDWICH, OR HOT DOG SANDWICH SERVED WITH FRENCH FRIED POTATOES, AND A SOFT DRINK AND EITHER ICE CREAM SANDWICH, ICE CREAM CONE, OR FROZEN YOGURT FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES, AND CAKES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 1992 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |