USPTO serial 74010016
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
FORT WORTH, TX
Other trademarks owned by TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
FORT WORTH, TX
Other trademarks owned by TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
FORT WORTH, TX
Other trademarks owned by TEXAS DAIRY QUEEN OPERATORS' COUNCIL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S. ABRAMS
DAVID S ABRAMS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CHILDREN'S COMBINATION MEAL CONSISTING OF EITHER HAMBURGER SANDWICH, CHICKEN SANDWICH, FISH SANDWICH, OR HOT DOG SANDWICH SERVED WITH FRENCH FRIED POTATOES, AND A SOFT DRINK AND EITHER ICE CREAM SANDWICH, ICE CREAM CONE, OR FROZEN YOGURT FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES, AND CAKES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 18, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 18, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |