USPTO serial 74010419
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU CHATEAU D'AIGUILHE
F-33350 CASTILLON LA BATAILLE, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU CHATEAU D'AIGUILHE
SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU CHATEAU D'AIGUILHE
F-33350 CASTILLON LA BATAILLE, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU CHATEAU D'AIGUILHE
SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU CHATEAU D'AIGUILHE
F-33350 CASTILLON LA BATAILLE, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE CIVILE D'EXPLOITATION DU CHATEAU D'AIGUILHE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNER, SCHWARTZ, ET ALSTE 510 1800 DIAGONAL RDP O BOX 299ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-0299| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 3, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 22, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 26, 1992 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1991 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |