USPTO serial 74010517
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANCY RUBNER-FRANDSEN
NANCY RUBNER-FRANDSEN SEIDEL, GONDA, LAVORGNA & MONACO, PC1800 TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | COLLECTION AND SHIPPING KITS FOR BODY FLUIDS, BODY TISSUE, CHEMICALS, DRUGS, DRUG PARAPHERNALIA AND OTHER PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FOR FORSENIC, TOXICOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS RELATING TO CIVIL LITIGATION, CRIMINAL LITIGATION AND JOB ACTION PROCEEDINGS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | FORENSIC LABORATORY, CONSULTATIVE, EXPERT OPINION AND TESTIMONY SERVICES IN CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES, TRACE EVIDENCE AND CHEMICAL HAZARD DETECTION IN FOOD, DRINK AND CONSUMER PRODUCTS; FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY; FORENSIC SUBSTANCE ABUSE TESTING; IDENTIFICATION, ASSAYS ANDD ORIGIN ELUCIDATIONS OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES; PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL COMPAISONS, INDIVIDULIZATIONS AND IDENTIFICATIONS OF TRACE EVIDENCE; CHEMICAL HAZARD DETECTION IN FOOD, DRINK AND CONSUMER; PRODUCTS; ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMMUNITY TOXICOLOGY: CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY; BIOANALYTICAL PHARMACOLOGY; DEVELOPMENT, MODIFI | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |