USPTO serial 74011015
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R. UHLIR
JAMES R UHLIR CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, ET AL2800 PACIFIC FIRST CTR 1420 5TH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | INSULATING FIBERS FOR CLOTHING | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |