USPTO serial 74011026
XTG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XTG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R. UHLIR
JAMES R UHLIR CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, ET AL2800 PACIFIC FIRST CTR1420 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MOUNTAIN CLIMBING AND SKIING APPAREL, NAMELY, COATS, JACKETS, WIND-RESISTANT JACKETS, PARKAS, ANORAKS, PANTS, SHORTS, KNICKERS, ONE-PIECE SUITS, SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATERS, VESTS, TURTLENECKS, UNDERWEAR, BELTS, GAITORS, HATS, HEADBANDS, GLOVES, SCARVES, SOCKS, BOOTS AND SHOES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |