USPTO serial 74011214
KIM DANIELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIM DANIELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAREN ARTZ ASH
KAREN ARTZ ASH AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | percussion musical instruments and accessories, namely, drums, drumsticks, cymbals, booms, and travel carrier bags for musical instruments | ABANDONED | Jul 15, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1993 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 9, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 28, 1991 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 13, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |