USPTO serial 74011287
ABC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUPO, ANTHONY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ABC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, ESSEX SS2 6GH, GB
SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, ESSEX SS2 6GH, GB
SOUTHEND-ON-SEA, ESSEX SS2 6GH, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R. CYPHER
JAMES R CYPHERSTE 1607 FINANCIAL CTR BLDG405 14TH STOAKLAND, CA 94612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SPORT SHOES, NAMELY RUNNING SHOES, JOGGING SHOES, HIKING SHOES AND WALKING SHOES; A COMPONENT OF SHOES CONSISTING OF A PRESSURIZED CYLINDER FILLED WITH AIR WHICH ABSORBS ENERGY AND THEN SPRINGS BACK TO SHAPE AFTER EACH HEEL STRIKE AND CUSHIONS THE FOOT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |