USPTO serial 74011838
MOTOR SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1859299Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 1994
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOTOR SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD G. CUMMINGS
RONALD G CUMMINGS OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANYINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTFOUR FARM SPRINGSFARMINGTON, CT 06032Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | ELECTRICAL GENERATORS, MAGNETO IGNITION UNITS, ELECTRIC MOTORS FOR USE WITH AUTOMOBILES, BOATS, AIRCRAFT AND MACHINES, AND PARTS FOR EACH OF THE FOREGOING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 27, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 1991 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |