USPTO serial 74012192
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALAN B. SAMLAN
ALAN B SAMLAN FOX AND GROVE, CHARTEREDSEARS TWR STE 7818233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6404| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEAL REPLACEMENT POWDER FOR DIETARY USE | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 4, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |