Drawing for LE CHEVAL BLANC

USPTO serial 74012244

LE CHEVAL BLANC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SARAI, BALDEV
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LE CHEVAL BLANC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID L. JUST

DAVID L JUST LUCAS & JUST205 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 27, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 1991CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 25, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 25, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 15, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance