USPTO serial 74012418
BARRACUDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BARRACUDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN M. MCCORMACK
JOHN M MCCORMACK KOLISCH, HARTWELL & DICKINSON520 S W YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SUNGLASSES | ABANDONED | Mar 19, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1990 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1990 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |